Evaluating the Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Industrial Equipment Maintenance Costs

Authors

  • Mohammad Mahdi Masoumian * Department of Industrial Engineering, Khajeh Nasir Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5118-982X
  • Ali Cheraghalikhani Department of Industrial Engineering, Tafresh University, Business Model Simulation and Design Laboratory, Central Laboratory, Tafresh University, Tafresh, Iran. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0158-2183
  • Ali Hossein Mirzaei Beni Department of Industrial Engineering, Tafresh University, Business Model Simulation and Design Laboratory, Central Laboratory, Tafresh University, Tafresh, Iran. https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3074-0151

https://doi.org/10.22105/raise.v3i1.80

Abstract

Effective maintenance planning for agricultural machinery requires a reliable estimation of future repair and operating costs. Tractors are among the most important capital assets in agricultural operations, and their repair, oil, and fuel costs tend to increase as cumulative operating hours grow. Accurate prediction of these cost components can support maintenance budgeting, economic life assessment, and replacement-related decision-making. This study applies a polynomial regression-based machine learning approach to predict indices of agricultural tractor maintenance costs. The dependent variables include the cumulative repair cost index, cumulative oil cost index, and cumulative fuel cost index, while cumulative operating hours are used as the main explanatory variable. Cost values are standardized using cumulative cost indices to reduce the effects of inflation, differences in tractor purchase prices, and variations across tractor types. The predictive performance of second-degree and third-degree polynomial models and an exponential model is evaluated using goodness-of-fit and error measures. The results indicate that the third-degree polynomial regression model yields the lowest prediction error among the cost indices studied. The findings suggest that polynomial regression can provide a simple, interpretable, and practically useful tool for forecasting tractor maintenance cost trajectories and supporting machinery management decisions.

Keywords:

Agricultural tractors, Maintenance cost prediction, Cumulative cost index, Polynomial regression, Machine learning, Repair and maintenance costs

References

  1. [1] Bowers, W., & Hunt, D. R. (1970). Application of mathematical formulas to repair cost data. Transactions of the asae, 13(6), 806–809. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.38725

  2. [2] Fairbanks, G. E., Larson, G. H., & Chung, D. S. (1971). Cost of using farm machinery. Transactions of the asae, 14(1), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.38233

  3. [3] Rotz, C. A. (1987). A standard model for repair costs of agricultural machinery. Applied engineering in agriculture, 3(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.26633

  4. [4] Khoub Bakht, G. K., Ahmadi, H., Akram, A., & Karimi, M. (2009). Repair and maintenance cost models for MF285 tractor: A case study in central region of Iran. Advances in biological research, 3(1–2), 19–23. https://www.idosi.org/abr/3(1-2)/4.pdf

  5. [5] Keshavarzpour, F. (2011). Prediction of repair and maintenance costs of John Deere 3140 tractors. World engineering & applied sciences journal, 2(2), 11–14. https://idosi.org/weasj/2(2)11/1.pdf

  6. [6] Khodabakhshian, R., & Shakeri, M. (2011). Prediction of repair and maintenance costs of farm tractors by using of preventive maintenance. International journal of agriculture sciences, 3(1), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.9735/0975-3710.3.1.39-44

  7. [7] Rashidi, M., & Ranjbar, I. (2016). Prediction of repair and maintenance costs of universal 650 tractors based on accumulated usage hours. Agricultural engineering research journal, 6(1), 10–14. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.aerj.2016.10.14

  8. [8] Dahab, M. H., Mohamed, A. O.,& Abdalla, N. O. K. (2021). Effect of hours of use and age in years in estimating repair and maintenance costs for two sizes of agricultural tractors in northern Sudan. Journal of agronomy research, 4(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2639-3166.jar-21-3875

  9. [9] Rohani, A., Abbaspour-Fard, M. H., & Abdolahpour, S. (2011). Prediction of tractor repair and maintenance costs using artificial neural network. Expert systems with applications, 38(7), 8999–9007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.118

  10. [10] Rohani, A. (2013). Prediction of tractor repair and maintenance costs using RBF neural network. World applied sciences journal, 28(12), 1929–1937. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.28.12.2294

  11. [11] Numsong, A., Posom, J., & Chuan-Udom, S. (2023). Artificial neural network-based repair and maintenance cost estimation model for rice combine harvesters. International journal of agricultural and biological engineering, 16(2), 38–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20231602.59

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Masoumian, M. M. ., Cheraghalikhani, A. ., & Mirzaei Beni, A. H. . (2026). Evaluating the Performance of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Industrial Equipment Maintenance Costs. Research Annals of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 3(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.22105/raise.v3i1.80